THE chief executive of Brent is taking home an astonishing £205,000 heading a group of 18 council fat cats raking in a combined salary of nearly £2.5 million a year.

THE chief executive of Brent is taking home an astonishing £205,000 heading a group of 18 council fat cats raking in a combined salary of nearly £2.5 million a year.

Brent boss, Gareth Daniel who earns £60,000 more than the Prime Minister and a staggering seven times as much as a newly qualified teacher working in inner London, who takes home £27,000 a year.

A further four more directors including Martin Cheeseman OBE, earn more than £140,000.

The shocking figures, obtained by BBC Panorama under the Freedom of Information Act, will come as a further blow to the borough, which is already reeling from an expected 400 job losses and £90m in cuts to services.

Libraries, day centres for people with learning disabilities and advisory groups have all fallen victim to the drive to slash costs, and more services are likely to have their funding trimmed

LETS STOP THE FAT CAT WAGE BILL, SACK Gareth Daniel AN Martin Cheeseman OBE  AND USE THE SAVINGS TO SAVE OUR SERVICES!

Brent(Bent)councils Steven Doohan ...... Wembley Police Officers Pc Jamie Hoile 452Qk/Pc Simon Underwood 353Qk

On the morning of the 17 of March 2009 I attended Brent magistrate’s court to appeal an abatement notice served on me by Brent (Bent) council.
It was claimed by Steven Doohan who is employed by Brent (bent) council environment department that I was playing loud music. This occurred on the 10 of September 2008 at 12 o clock midday, though this was reported by my next door neighbour who is known to me and suffers from a mental illness! No other neighbour was consulted in relation to this complaint which considering I lived in a block of 7 flats!
I was somewhat taken aback by this claim and in disbelief said aloud fuck off...though this comment was not directed to Doohan he none the less took exception to the comment and when I asked him what this was about Doohan stood with his head bowed and said in a childish tone that I am not prepared to discuss this matter while you talk to me in this manner. I again asked him what this was about and again he stood there like a child head bowed and again stated that he was not prepared to talk to me while I talk to him in this manner. I then step out and stood in front of him and again asked him what this was about, and again he stated that he was not prepared to discuss this with me.
3 times I asked him and 3 times he replied with the same comment so getting fed up with his child like attitude I told him to fuck off. He seemed to be put out by this comment, but I had given him 3 chances to explain what this was about. So I again told him to fuck off to which he turn and walked away but not without turning and giving me a look of I will get you back.
This he did by obtaining an abatement notice and putting it though my door at 12 o clock midnight! This caused my dog to bark and woke me up.... on checking the front door I found said notice on the floor. On reading this notice I was somewhat confused and could not get back to sleep. I rang the council but was greeted by a telephone message informing me that the council services operated between 8 am and 5.30 pm!
I sat there unable to sleep and was trying to work out what this notice meant.
In the morning I again contacted the council and was put though to a manager by the name of Clive Dinsey who seem to be very sarcastic and laughed when I raised the issue that the notice was delivered at 12 o clock midnight which I found to be unacceptable. I later learnt that he was trying to be clever by taping the conversation and trying very hard to get me to say something that he could use against me... Though at no time during the conversation did he inform me that he was taping the conversation! 

I later learnt that Steven Doohan was going to issue me with a warning as this was a one off offence and yet I was served an abatement notice instead! I also learnt that this was due to me not making noise but due to the fact that I told him to fuck off. Here is a council officer using the resouces of the council to seek revenge for me telling him to fuck off!
I noted that I could appeal this notice and did so.... Though the delay in getting this matter before the court was due to the court losing my file and I therefore had to reissue my appeal.
I served the notice on Brent (Bent) Council and on the morning of 17 March 2009 I attended the court for the hearing. Brent (bent) council failed to turn up and the court decided that the matter should be dealt with in the councils absents.
I was successful in my appeal, yet it was a success without any joy as I was hoping to have the council present to defend its actions.
On getting home I change out of my suit and put a t-shirt and jeans on. As I was drinking a cup of tea and smoking a rolled up cigarette that contained only tobacco, there was a loud bang on my door to which I opened and was shocked to be confronted by five police officers and a member of Brent (Bent) councils environment department shouting at me to put the dog away.
To say I near on shit myself is an understatement as I have never had the police at my door in such manner and was completely shocked.
Here was Brent (Bent) council at my door with the police, yet they failed to turn up to attend court that very morning!
Clearly this was in response to my winning the court case.
I closed the door and put my dog away as asked and opened the door and stepped out to talk to them pulling the door ajar behind me as I did not want the parrot flying out.


                                         PC SIMON UNDERWOOD 353QK

I was spoken to by a Pc Simon Underwood 353 Qk who informed me that a complaint was made concerning my dog. It was alleged that I told a postman to Fuck off and set my dog on said post man on the 20 of February 2009 and on the 25 of February it was alleged that I chased the postman down the road barking at him.
I was shocked by the allegations as this never happened and yet in disbelief that it was stated that I chased said post man and was barking at him!
I then was told by Pc Jamie Hoile 452 QK that he was going to issue me with a 80 pound penlity notice.
I had not conducted myself in such manner and was therefore not going to pay said fine to which I informed him. This refusal was not what he expected and he grabbed me and stated that he was arresting me and reached for his handcuffs to which I put my hands out for him to cuff me. I then asked him why he was arresting me and he realising that his action was more of a knee jerk response to my refusal to except said 80 pound fine then blurts out that he can smell cannabis coming from my property and puts the cuffs on me and states that under the drugs act he was entitled to search my home for drugs. I had not smoked cannabis and told him that he could not smell cannabis coming from my property to which he used the handcuffs twisting them towards me and forcing me into my property. I was concerned that the parrot would fly out the door and at the same time informed Pc Hoile 452 Qk that there was a camera above the door and inside that recorded audio and visual and that he was entering my property illegally. I was force backwards into my home by Pc Hoile 452Qk as Pc Simon Underwood 353 Qk push past and lead the way into my home illegally. This was all captured on camera.
In side Pc Hoile 452 Qk took the partly smoked roll up and declared it was a cannabis joint and put it in a evidence bag stating that under the drugs act he was now authorised to search my home. I told him that it was not a cannabis joint and that he was conducting an illegal search having illegally entered my property. I again informed him that this was being captured on camera.
At this point he opened a wardrobe and noticed a police hat that was used for armature filming and noting also that there in a bag was a utility belt with handcuffs. He stated to me, you are not a Thames valley police officer and was further arresting me on theft as he believed that the items were stolen. To which I informed him that I had legally purchased the items. At no time was I cautioned in relation to any of this! Pc Jamie Hoile 452Qk then proceeded to search the rest of the room as I stood there being detained by Pc Simon Underwood 353 Qk
The night before I had found outside in the communal area a small bag containing a yellowish powder to which I pick up and brought inside and unsure of its contents put on the side as I had to write up some papers for the court appeal in the morning. I had completely forgotten about it and Pc Hoile 452 Qk picked it up stating that he believed this to be cocaine and was further arresting me for procession of a class A drug. I though cocaine was a white powder, as it turn out it was amphetamine other wises known as speed which is a class B related drug. Again I was not cautioned in relation to this!
No other room was searched and I was lead out by both Police officers and was about to lock my door when Pc Hoile 452 Qk took the keys declaring that I could use them as a weapon. The door was locked and I was lead away and put in a police car while Hoile and underwood stood away trying to get their storeys fixed as both officers were based at different police stations.
I was taken to Wembley police station and booked in. While I was detained in a cell Pc Hoile 452Qk came to my cell and informed me that I was being de-arrested in relation to the cannabis as it was lost on the way to the police station! This was the reason for illegally entering my property and clearly if presented would have been established not to contain cannabis and prove the grounds for entering my home were indeed illegal!
I was asked by Pc Hoile 452 Qk to sign his book and upon reading it I was dismayed to read the lies contained therein and refused to sign it.
I should state that as I was arrested for this yellowish powder which turned out to be amphetamine which is a class B drug, at the police station I was subjected to a drug test which was negative as I do not take drugs.
I was charged with procession of a class B drug and a section 5 offence in that it was stated that I told a postman to Fuck off! Though the claim that I set my dog on the said post man and that I chased him down the rd barking at him was not put before the court!
As I was being released from the Police station I was given my property back only to find that my keys were missing. The custody sergeant phoned Pc Hoile to ask where my keys were to which he said there were no keys!
On getting home and locating a spare set of keys I entered my home and in the front room saw that a laptop computer and the camera hard drive were missing!
It was very clear that Pc Hoile 452 Qk had used my keys to enter my home to remove the video evidence.
During the interview in custody I stated that the conduct of said officers was captured by camera which I was asked if I would supply the police with a copy to which I stated yes in court I will supply it but not before!
I have since put a complaint in against the unlawful conduct of Pc Jamie Hoile 452 Qk and Pc Simon Underwood 353 Qk which is not unjustified as the said conduct is evident in the statements of both officers.
I State that both police officers are liars and in testifying in court that they both conspired to pervert the course of justice.
Since the above took place and due to my allegations against said police officers I have been subjected to unlawful conduct by police officers from Wembley police station and have since made a further two complaints regarding this conduct.
As well as taking legal action in relation to wrongful arrest and false imprisonment that occurred on the 18 January 2010, whereby I was arrested for procession of court documents that the police claimed I was unlawfully in procession of. I was detained for 12 hours and threatened by a sergeant o Conner in the police cells. I again was subjected to a drug test which again was negative!
On being interviewed 12 hours later I was asked how I came to be in procession of said court papers. I stated that these documents were sent to me. I was asked how can I prove this and was presented with the documents that were now contained in a clear see through evidence bag. I pointed out the page that was visible to see though the clear plastic bag, to which would have been evident to the police, that my name and address was written on the page and beneath this the letter started Dear Mr Diggins!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Clearly the police officer recoiled as if I just sucker punched him right in his stupid head and I was duly released.
On the morning of the 18 January 2010 I was due to appear in the county court as Brent (Bent) council wanted to have me evicted and imprisoned for two years in relation to the 2006 injunction served on me. Part of the allegations against me involved the abatement order served on me on the 10 of September 2009 and dismissed at Brent magistrate’s court on the 17 of March 2010!
The morning the 18 January the power supply to my property was switched off, upon going outside to check if this was just my property I noticed that I was the only one affected and also noticed that the door to the main fuse box was open. I went back inside to find a lighter as the communal area lighting was also turned off.
With the aid of the lighter I found that the main fuse was pulled out so I bent down to put it back in.
At this point I heard someone rushing towards me and stood up, I could not see clearly as it was still dark and having used a lighter for light my eyes were trying to focus. At this point something was thrown at me and then there was the sound of breaking glass.
There was some form of liquid on my right leg which started to burn, this person then ran.
I went straight into my home and turned the lights on and noticed this liquid was eating into my jeans and causing a great deal of pain. I grabbed my mobile and dialled 999 and requested an ambulance.
I remove my jeans and went into the kitchen and attempted to wash this liquid off as it was burning into my leg.
The police arrived as did an ambulance and the fire brigade.
Two Police officers were present and said that I was to go with the ambulance.
I did not want the police to remain in my property and asked them to leave. They replied that as this was a crime scene and that they were staying. I stated that the crime had taken place outside my home and not in my home therefore I wanted them out of my property. They made it very clear that if I remove them from my property they would force my door open to gain entry.
I knew that the sneaky bastard police would take this opportunity to conduct an illegal search of my home in the hope of offsetting my complaint against Pc Jamie Hoile 452 Qk and Pc Simon Underwood 353 Qk
I was informed by the ambulance crew that the injury was serious and could result in this liquid eating into a main vain and causing death.
I had no choice but to leave the police on my property and was taken to the hospital. Two police officers came with me.
On receiving treatment I was released from hospital and was arrested by the two officers and taken to Wembley police station and informed that I was being detained for further investigation as some legal documents were found on my property. These document as stated were sent to me as I had been turned down for legal aid. The police had no lawful right in law to interfere with these documents and had acted therefore illegally in seizing them.
While detained in the police cells I was further informed that my dog had been removed from my home and was now in a cell in Kilburn!
I could not work out why my dog was removed from my home and concluded that I was not going to be going home, though why?
Unknown to me the police on the pretext of seizing these legal documents and reading them, therefore were aware that I was due to appear before the county court.
The police in turn contacted Brent (Bent) council and clearly due to this conversation were under the impression that the case would succeed in my absents and that I therefore would be evicted and imprisoned for 2 years.
So the police though that they could take advantage of this by detaining me in advance and also take the opportunity of searching my home in the hope that they could gain further advantage in finding something illegal.
Nothing illegal was found in my home by the police, but raises very serious questions as to the conduct and actions of the police and Brent (Bent) council.
I now live in fear of being arrested by the police as this injunction carries the powers of arrest. I rarely go out due to this fear and continue to be threatened by Brent (Bent) council with eviction and 2 years inprisonment.
I should point out that not all police officers based at Wembley Police station are as ignorant as the officers who I have had dealings with and mention here. There are those who realise they are being used by Brent (Bent) council.
I intend to take legal action to address this injustice that I have suffered for near on 5 years.
I too am now prepared to, if need be, take direct action against the police and Brent (Bent) council. The degree of action I am prepared to take will be evident at the time of such action and in turn will raise questions into the conduct that I have been subjected to.
The Police and Brent (Bent) council can take this as a direct threat, but as long as I am subjected to this unjust and inhuman treatment then I reserve the right to defend myself in any way I see fit.

JATIN GHEDIA........................... BRENT(BENT)COUNCILS..TWO BIT LAWYER.

I OFTEN WONDER WHAT SORT OF PERSON ENTERS INTO LAW? THERE ARE THOSE WHO HAVE HONOURABLE INTENTIONS AND THOSE WHO HAVE DIS HONOURABLE INTENTIONS. THE LATTER IS THE WHORE OF THE LEGAL WORLD, THAT IS TO SAY THEY USE THE LAW FOR SELF SERVING PURPOSE.
YOU WOULD BE AWARE OF THIS SORT OF LAWYER WHEN SIGNING A CONTRACT OR PURCHASING A FRIDGE FOR EXAMPLE, THEY ARE THE ONES WHO WRITE THE SMALL PRINT ON SAID CONTRACT. TO READ THIS SMALL PRINT YOU WOULD NEED TO HAVE A LAW DEGREE OR PAY ANOTHER LAWYER TO TRANSLATE SAID SMALL PRINT.
MOST PEOPLE BUY OR SIGN AN AGREEMENT IN GOOD FAITH ONLY TO FIND THAT THE SMALL PRINT EXCLUDES OR LIMITS ANY RIGHTS YOU MAY HAVE IN LAW.

THE ABOVE IS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF A DIS HONOURABLE LAWYER, ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A DIS HONOURABLE LAWYER WOULD BE REPERSENTED BY JATIN GHEDIA, A DIS HONOURABLE LAWYER EMPLOYED BY BRENT(BENT)COUNCIL.

JATIN GHEDIA HAS REPEATERLY THREATENED ME OVER A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS WITH EVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT OF 2 YEARS, EVEN THOUGH I HAVE NEVER BEEN QUESTION OR ARRESTED OR CHARGED IN CONNECTION TO ALLIGATION MADE AGAINST ME IN THE COUNTY COURT BY THE STAFF OF BRENT(BENT)COUNCIL/ NOTTINGHILL HOUSING AND BRENT(BENT)HOUSING PARTNERSHIP.

THE ONLY THING I DID WAS TO MAKE A STAND AGAINST THE ABOVE NAMED ORGANISATIONS INTENTION OF REDEVELOPING THE BARHAM PARK ESTATE. THIS INVOLVED REPLACING THE 214 DEWELLING WITH 490 DEWELLINGS. I STARTED A CAMPAIGN AGAINST THIS AND AS A RESULT THE CAMPAIGN WITH THE SUPPORT OF ALL THE TENANTS REDUCED THE NUMBER OF PLANNED DEWELLINGS TO 375. A REDUCTION OF 115 DEWELLING WHICH IN MONEY TERMS AMOUNTS TO 100 000 POUND LOSS IN COUNCIL TAX REVENUE TO BRENT(BENT)COUNCIL

FOR THIS ACTION I HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO REPEATED THREATS BY JATIN GHEDIA ON BEHALF OF BRENT(BENT)COUNCIL/ NOTTINGHILL HOUSING AND BRENT(BENT)HOUSING PARTNERSHIP.

THOUGH YOU WOULD THINK THAT JATIN GHEDIA BEING A LAWYER WOULD BE AWARE THAT A PERSON IS INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY!

FOR NEAR ON FIVE YEARS JATIN GHEDIA HAS REPEATERLY THREATENED ME WITH EVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT, WHICH HAS CAUSED ME A GREAT DEAL OF STRESS AND ALARM TO THE POINT I CONSIDERED TAKING MY OWN LIFE.
JATIN GHEDIA HAS KNOWN OF THE CONDITIONS I WAS LIVING IN AS I BROUGHT THE MATTER TO HIS ATTENTION. IN TURN JATIN GHEDIA TOLD ME THAT IF I CONTACT THE COUNCIL HE WOULD SEEK TO HAVE ME EVICTED AND PUT IN PRISON.

I ASK YOU WHAT SORT OF PERSON WOULD KICK A PERSON WHEN THEY ARE DOWN?
JATIN GHEDIA WOULD AND DID MANY TIMES.

THATS WHY SPEAKING FROM EXPERIENCE I CAN STATE THAT JATIN GHEDIA IS WITHOUT CONSCIENCE AND A SELF SERVING WHORE.

Barbara Rowe. A TOTAL BITCH

WHO IS BARBARA ROWE?
IN THE 80s/90s BARBARA ROWE WAS EMPLOYED BY BRENT(BENT)COUNCIL AS A MANAGER IN THE RENT ACCOUNT DEPARTMENT. IT HERE THAT SHE ESTABLISHED HERSELF TO BE A TOTAL BITCH BY WRITING TO A 69 YEAR OLD TENANT TREATENING TO EVICT HIM. BARBARA ROWE DID THIS FOR NEAR ON FIVE YEARS WITH OUT ONCE BOTHERING TO CHECK ON THIS ELDERLY TENANT. BELOW IS THE FULL STORY


Friday, 18 March 1994
A PENSIONER lay dead in his flat for more than four years as a council continued to send him court summonses over rent arrears, an inquest was told yesterday.
All the summonses were sent by post to John Sheppard, 69, a retired security officer, at his one-bedroom flat on the Stonebridge Park Estate at Harlesden, north-west London. His death went undiscovered until last December, when workmen broke in to investigate a water leak.
He was sent a vast amount of mail over the years, including summonses and notices of a possession order and rent arrears.
Barbara Rowe, manager of Brent council's tenancy services, said the council had since changed its policy and included with its summonses a personal contact through the social services.
Recording an open verdict, the Hornsey coroner Dr William Dolman said: 'This is the most extraordinary case that has come to the notice of any court I've been involved in.'
He added: 'One has to say that the facts relating to this case demonstrate the most extraordinary complacent approach to this matter by the London Borough of Brent . . . One hopes that no such event will ever take place again.'
Barbara Rowe wrote to Mr Sheppard for 4 years, never once in that time did she receive a reply, nor did she make any other attempt to contact this elderly person. Meanwhile Mr Sheppards body lay decomposing.

AS YOU HAVE READ THE CORONER DECRIBED THE ACTIONS OR SHOULD THAT BE LACK OF ACTION BY BRENT(BENT)COUNCIL AS THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY CONPLACENT APPROACH TO THIS MATTER!
AS WE ALL KNOW THE BUCK STOPS WITH THE MANAGER WHO HAPPENS TO BE BARBARA ROWE.
WHY BARBARA ROWE WAS NOT SACKED IS A QUESTION YOU MAY WELL ASK?

YOU HAVE TO ALSO ASK WHAT SORT OF PERSON WOULD WRITE TO AN ELDERLY TENANT AND THREATEN THEM AND NOT BE AWARE THAT THIS WAS A ELDERLY PERSON WHO HAS NOT REPONDED TO SAID LETTERS!
TO NOT GET A RESPONCE FOR NEAR ON FIVE YEARS TO SAID THREATENING LETTERS OF EVICTION IS BEYOND BELIEF GIVEN THE FACT THAT BARBARA ROWE WOULD HAVE HAD THIS ELDERLY TENANTS DETAIL ON RECORD!

SO AGAIN THE QUESTION HAS TO BE ASKED WHY WAS SHE NOT SACKED? WHY?

THE PURPOSE OF THIS SITE IS TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PUBLIC THE CONDUCT OF BRENT COUNCIL/ BRENT HOUSING PARTNERSHIP AND NOTTINGHILL HOUSING TRUST. LEAST WE NOT FORGET THE INVOLVEMENT OF WEMBLEY POLICE STATION AND THE CONDUCT OF TWO  BRENT POLICE OFFICERS! 
THE NAMES OF THOSE EMPLOYED BY THE ABOVE ORGANIZATIONS, AND LISTED BELOW, ARE THOSE WHOS CONDUCT I BRING INTO QUESTION.


1) DIRECTOR OF BRENT COUNCIL MARTIN CHEESEMAN (OBE) 
2) BRENT COUNCIL REGENERATION MANGER PAUL McCONNELL
3) BRENT COUNCIL REGENERATION PROJECT MANAGER ROSEMARY PERRETT 
4) BRENT COUNCIL REGENERATION PROJECT MANAGER LINDA BEASLEY
5) BRENT COUNCIL REGENERATION PROJECT MANAGER VALERIA CLARKE
6) BRENT COUNCIL ENVIOMENTAL OFFICER STEPHEN DOOHAN
7) BRENT HOUSING PARTNERSHIP MANAGER BARBARA ROWE
8) NOTTINGHILL REGENERATION MANAGER HEATHER DAVIS
9) NOTTINGHILL REGENERATION MANAGER LORRAINE GILBERT
10) BRENT COUNCILS LAWYER JATIN GHEDIA
11) BRENT POLICE OFFICERS PC JAMIE HOILE & PC SIMON UNDERWOOD 


SINCE 2006 THE ABOVE NAMED HAVE ALL CONTRIBUTED TO LIES AND ATTACKS ON MY CHARACTER TO OBTAIN A COURT INJUNCTION THAT HAS BEEN USED TO REPEATEDLY THREATEN ME WITH EVICTION AND 2 YRS IMPRISONMENT
EVEN THOUGH I HAVE NEVER BEEN QUESTIONED, ARRESTED OR CONVICTED OF ANY OFFENCE!


I HAVE BEEN TREATED AS IF I WAS CONVICTED!


CHECK OUT THE PHOTOS TO SEE HOW I WAS FORCED TO LIVE AND THE INJURY I SUFFERED AS A RESULT. WHAT YOU DON’T SEE IS THE FACT KNOWN TO THE ABOVE BUT IGNORED, IS HOW I WAS FORCED TO LIVE WITHOUT NO HEATING OR HOT WATER FOR OVER 4 YEARS! DENIED COUNCIL SERVICES BECAUSE I DARED TO SPEAK OUT!

MARTIN CHEESEMAN (OBE) HAS BEEN AWARE OF THIS CONDUCT AS IT WAS STARTED IN HIS OFFICE ON THE 25 MAY 2006. WHEREBY A LETTER WAS SENT TO THE THEN COUNCILOR BOB BLACKMAN, TO WHICH THE CONTENTS WERE MISLEADING AND A SMEAR AGAINST MY CHARACTER. THIS LETTER WAS SIGNED AT MARTIN CHEESEMANS REQUEST!

CLEARLY IF THE DIRECTOR OF HOUSING MARTIN CHEESEMAN HAS NO REGARD FOR THE TRUTH THEN IT FOLLOWS THAT THOSE EMPLOYED UNDER HIM WOULD HAVE EVEN LESS REGARD FOR THE TRUTH! 


Here are a few links for you to check out.


http://wembleymatters.blogspot.com/2010/01/council-accused-of-intimidating-brent.html#comment-form


http://homepage.ntlworld.com/john.diggins1


http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/05/340427.htm


http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/world/2005/04/309605.html